SAN MARCOS: Bond-financing plan moves forward
SM district hopes to use $54M in bonds to cover retiree health benefits debts
By SHAYNA CHABNER - Staff Writer | ∞
SAN MARCOS ---- School district trustees took steps Monday toward implementing a plan to invest the proceeds of $54 million in bonds to earn interest to pay off future retiree health insurance bills and the bonds.
For nearly a year, the San Marcos Unified School District has been exploring its options for funding roughly $58.4 million in health insurance bills the district projects it will owe nearly 1,300 retired employees over the next 60 years.
Trustees agreed this spring that they would move forward with the plan to sell bond measures, called "other post employment bonds," and invest the money in a trust with the goal of earning enough interest to cover their retiree obligations and the loan. District officials have said they hope to sell the bonds by January.
On Monday, the district took the first of several procedural steps toward putting that plan into action.
In a unanimous vote, the board approved an updated actuarial study that outlines San Marcos Unified's current and future health insurance obligations for retirees as of July 1. Trustees also agreed to apply to enter into trust with CALPERS, a California Employee Retirement Fund, for the bond proceeds and investment.
In its upcoming Sept. 8 meeting, the board also will be asked to challenge the plan in court, opening it up to legal questions and concerns from the public for 90 days, Assistant Superintendent of Business Gary Hamels said.
"This is what we believe to be the best, most secure way" for meeting the district's obligation, Hamels said.
"We have tried to shoot holes into it," he said. "But it's a 60-year project, and we are done paying it in 35 (years). It's hard for me to turn away from it."
All but one of the district's trustees, Mary Borevitz, has backed the plan. Borevitz, who reiterated her concerns Monday and voted against entering into a trust with CALPERS, said the plan seems "too good to be true."
"I am just not comfortable doing with taxpayers money what I consider to be a gamble," Borevitz said. "I hope I am wrong."
District officials and fellow trustees have countered that to not do something to meet the district's health benefits obligations to retirees would be foolish.
Under the plan presented to trustees, the district hopes to earn an average annual interest of at least 7.75 percent on the money it collects from selling its 35-year bond measures.
If that happens, the district would then raise enough money to not only pay back the bond measures, but to pay off its bills for retiree health benefits in almost half the amount of time it would take San Marcos Unified in the current system, where it pays down a small portion annually.
According to the actuarial study, paying off the $58.4 million in health benefits in a pay-as-you-go method over a 60-year period could cost the district roughly $191.7 million. The district's funding plan, on the other hand, cost the district the $55 million loan.
The savings "is just huge," Trustee David Horevitz said.
San Marcos Unified reportedly is the first school district in San Diego County to move forward with a plan that would finance health benefit debts with bonds. Hamels said Monday, though, that other nearby districts, including Escondido Union School District and Poway Unified School District, are exploring such options.
District officials have only recently begun adding up the true costs of retiree health benefits. For years, they only reported the annual cost of benefits.
But a federal accounting change in 2004 made it a requirement that all districts and other government agencies report and create plans for paying off future costs of health care and other benefits for current employees and retirees.
In addition to outlining a bond financing plan, San Marcos Unified adopted rules last year that eliminated health benefits for retirees hired after July 1, 2007, and placed a cap on the district's maximum contribution. In 1996, the district ended a long-standing policy under which it provided lifetime benefits to employees with more than 10 years of service.
Contact Shayna Chabner at (760) 740-5416 or schabner@nctimes.com
More Stories
Advertisement
Herb wrote on Aug 26, 2008 8:42 AM:The district should have a well founded retirement plan. What is going on here in 2008? Do we have a group of ignoramuses running the San Marcos School District? First the children are out of buses and the retirement medical plan is defunct.
I want to know who goofed up and let the plan get into this situation. What happened to the medical plan money? What happened to the school bus money?
How can a group of college educated people let an organization get into such bad shape in the first place? Or, is someone trying to feather their their own bed?
It is getting close to election time and we should take a look at what is going on in the management of the school district. We need more information.
Bull wrote on Aug 26, 2008 9:37 AM:The UNIONS must have pushed for this bigtime. All smoke & mirrors. Simply a way to make it WAY more difficult for the TAXPAYERS to DEMAND the true action needed, A HUGE REDUCTION IN THE RETIREE BENEFIT SUBSIDY keeping in mind that TAXPAYERS (90% of whom are NOT Civil Servants and pay almost ALL of civil servant's benefits via their taxes) no longer get such employer-provided retiree benefits. By bonding it, it make the take-away much more difficult. The TAXPAYERS get suckered again !
Underfunded or not funded wrote on Aug 26, 2008 10:42 AM:If private business did this kind of borrowing for future debt - the debt that should have already been funded, they would be liable. How can the San Marcos School District think that the citizens are going to sit still for this type of mis-management. The District has been deficit-spending for a long time, if that is the correct term, and when anyone questioned the budget, they were run out of town. Now we see that the budget does not contain the most basic of items,. the funding of health benefits. Didn't anyone take math, or better yet, basic accounting, in school ? How will they try to sell these bonds to the public - will they put up our schools as the collateral ?
Of the union by the union for the union wrote on Aug 26, 2008 11:19 AM:You didn't notice that was the board we got at the last election? Have you noticed all the early retirement that was done to move things off the current budget? Now the bonds we authorized for more classrooms go to pay teachers that aren't even teaching and didn't serve a full career. Meanwhile the kids are in prefabs and they play games with overlapping classes to meet the state pupil teacher ratio in name, but not in fact.
Only government employees get these kind of benefits, the rest of us have to SAVE for our retirement.
Who really controls SMUSD wrote on Aug 27, 2008 9:34 AM:All you have to do is look at who the Teacher’s Union endorses for current and upcoming board members to see that they seed the board. I have nothing against teachers, but I’m tired of the kids getting the shaft and there seems to be a big difference between the teacher in the classroom and the Teacher Union cronies turning the screws.
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (9444)
- TEMECULA: Protesters line intersection (5796)
- ESCONDIDO: 3 DUI arrests, 46 impounds at checkpoint (4653)
- ESCONDIDO: City's dreams of an 'upscale' downtown may be dying (4372)
- ESCONDIDO: Victim's roommate recalls July 4 shooting, friends gather for vigil (4050)
Advertisement
Videos
Advertisement




